Getting it Right - Welcome

The goal of this blog is to publish my thoughts on a variety of economic and political topics in the hopes that people who find them educational or beneficial will utilize them and/or forward to others who might find them interesting and/or worthwhile to promote to others, possibly including politicians who can push some of these ideas to fruition. The topics in my blog are meant to be of value on a long term basis, not a daily diary or political issue of the day log. If the information posted is useful to you, by all means utilize it and/or forward it as you see fit. If not useful, then merely ignore it. There are no universally agreed upon truisms and too little tolerance between some of those with opposing viewpoints to successfully convince the people with hardened opinions to move away from them. I am an analytical type person who will try to be as factual as I am able.

I disdain the current popularity of name calling and condemnation of viewpoints with no factual alternatives or logical solutions given that I see so often. If you don't have a solution based on fact and logic, then opt out of the discussion because you have nothing to contribute. My background is a degree in Economics from the University of Michigan and 39 years working in middle management jobs for a major retailer. My opinions are forged on the personal experence of life, family, friends, and work as well as triumphs and mistakes that I have made and hopefully learned from. My hope is that this blog helps you.

My first topic will be about personal finance. I chose that one first because most of us work long and hard just to survive but not all of us realize our dreams of becoming financially independent from the labors of our work. Much of our political votes/thinking also focus on the economy and in particular how well we are personally doing financially.

It is relatively simple, without sacrificing the enjoyment of living for 'today' and even at moderate incomes, to retire as a millionaire or multi-millionaire, if you focus on that goal consistently from a young age. It is also simple to ensure that your child or grandchild retires rich. It merely requires a one time gift of just $2,000 invested wisely and the passage of time. Please read my first post on this blog to learn more.


An index/schedule of past and future posts and their dates will always be updated so that it becomes the first post that you see below. If the date of a post that you wish to read is preceded by the word "Posted", then find it below or click on the title in the Blog archive to review.

Blog Archive

Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Democrats' Unfair Income Tax Cuts Complaints – Its Logical Conclusion

Democrats constantly complain that the Bush tax cuts unfairly favored the rich because they received the largest dollar tax cuts. If you follow their argument to its logical conclusion, then it becomes apparent that the only fair tax cut that Democrats could support is a zero tax cut. Allow me to explain by example.

Taxpayers 1, 2, 3, and 4 (respectively rich, middle class, lower middle class, and poor incomes) currently pay $100,000, $10,000, $1,000, and zero in annual income taxes. An across the board tax cut proposal for 10% is introduced into Congress. That means the four taxpayers would see their taxes cut 10% each for $10,000, $1,000, $100, and Zero respectively in income taxes saved. The Democratic Senator says wait, we can't give the rich taxpayer #1 a $10,000 tax cut when the middle class taxpayer #2, only gets $1,000. Nor can we afford to give all taxpayers a $10,000 tax cut or we will have huge deficits we cannot afford. So they agree to 'compromise' and limit the dollar tax cut maximum to $1,000 for everyone. So now, Taxpayer 1 only receives a 1% tax cut ($1,000) which for him is hardly anything at all.

Then the Democratic Senator from California speaks up and says, hey we can't give the middle class Taxpayer #2 $1,000 or ten times the dollar amount given to the lower middle class Taxpayer # 3. So a compromise is reached to make $100 the maximum tax cut for everyone. Now, Taxpayer #1 receives a $100 tax cut or just one tenth of 1% in tax cuts. Taxpayer # 2 also receives $100 in tax cuts or just a 1% tax cut. Taxpayer #3 receives the full 10% tax cut.

However, the Democratic Senator from Massachusetts chimes in and says this isn't right because Taxpayer #4, who paid no income taxes at all, isn't receiving a tax break. So the Democrats put their heads together and work out a compromise. A zero percent tax break yields the same tax percentage break to all (nothing) and the same dollar amounts to all (again nothing). All the Democrats agree and are happy. They finally came up with a 'fair' tax bill (that is no tax bill at all). But, are you as a taxpayer, happy?

Taken to its logical conclusion, the only tax cut that could satisfy Democrats quest for a fair tax cut to taxpayers is zero tax cuts. Any significant tax cut above zero will always produce different dollar amounts by income level and therefore by Democratic definition would be “unfair”.

No comments: