Here's where I agree with scientists:
1. Before the Big Bang that started the Universe, there was nothing – no matter, no energy.
2. Energy and matter are interchangeable – the atomic bomb proved that.
Here's where I disagree:
Per the Big Bang theory, out of nothing, in an infinitely small space, an energy so hot developed that it exploded into matter creating all the mater in the universe.
1. First problem – you can't get something from nothing. So this incredibly hot energy in an infinitely small space which supposedly started the Universe, could not have come from nothing.
2. Second problem – not only something from nothing in an infinitely small space, but supposedly energy so hot that it created enough matter to create hundreds of billions of galaxies, each with 100 to 400 billion stars, plus even more planets and moons, plus countless trillions of black holes. That's an incredible amount of matter that supposedly came from one energy source contained within an infinitely small space (less than the size of a single atom). How hot must this first spec of energy from nothing be to create such a huge amount of matter? Inconceivably, impossibly hot!! Sounds more like a “God” theory to me that really created the Universe, but scientists won't admit it.
No comments:
Post a Comment